Score: 8

"Well done!"

submission: The Strawberry

date: May 16, 2004

Great piece of work! I'd love to see you make more of these.

A few suggestions:

1. Increase the speed a bit. The slapstick feel of the toon would improve a lot if the pacing was tightened somewhat.

2. You don't really need the redundant "A couple of minutes later" titles. A quick fading to black and fading up to the next scene is enough to let the audience know that a little time has passed between scenes. They didn't need such titles in those old Wile E. Coyote cartoons, as you know. :)

3. Many people, as you have read, were unsure of whether the main character is alive at the end. You may want to clarify this by adding some animated swirls, birds, or stars above his head in the last shot.

If you make sequels, you could try a little music. But it's not a requirement for this fun toon.

Again, super job!

Score: 10

"A scathing parody of propoganda!"

submission: Birds n' Bees

date: February 27, 2003

This is one of the best parodies ever shown on Newgrounds. The people that hate it, don't understand what you were trying to do. The government used to LIE to us about how "safe" nukes were, and how we could survive a nuclear attack with "duck and cover." This Flash file is showing what WOULD have happened if the same tone was used for a subject they would NEVER have covered back then: Abortion. Although I am pro-choice, I can see that the point of this flash isn't about Abortion at all. It's about how the government lies to its own people.

Score: 7

"Major Hint here"

submission: The Angry Neighbors

date: February 13, 2003

When the plant man says "I don't give a damn..." do NOT interrupt him. Let him vent. This will complete the game. Otherwise, you'll loop endlessly.

And remember: Do NOT show favoritism or try to solve their problems for them.

Score: 8

"Funny and true"

submission: "crucify-me! Jesus"

date: January 12, 2003

And the atheist posters were far from hypocritical. Think before you post, okay 31k4b0ng? Get it? Got it? Good.

Score: 9

"Superb Jack Chick Skewering!"

submission: ChickTracts:Chick's Trick

date: January 9, 2003

A wonderful job picking apart the typical stupidity of a Jack Chick tract. Intelligent, witty, and well-done. PLEASE, make more!

Seneau: Tons of creativity and effort went into making that Flash movie, unlike your moronic non-review. Jack Chick's artwork is complete crap, especially compared to his pre-stroke days, idiot. The pop-ups were witty and clever, unlike your pathetic attempts at thinly-veiled preaching, you biased hypocrite. The pop-up commentary was entertaining, informative, and clever. Things you would never comprehend in your wettest dreams. He DOES use sources and he DOES provide great knowledge of historical and religious education, unlike your cowardly review. You're just terrified that people reading this pop-up tract will learn the FACT that Christianity is proven bullshit. He uses citations, unlike Jack Chick, who only uses references to his OWN works, which are thiny-veiled plugs to get people to buy the rest of his crap.

You're a biased moron, Seaneau. And your posting proves that self-proclaimed Christians are typically cocksuckers by nature. The only one that is ignorant is YOURSELF. So take your bible-thumping opinions and shove them back up your dead grandmother's cunt. Get it? Got it? Good.